HomeModel ComparisonsClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.6vsGemini 3.1 Pro

Which model is more cost-effective? Compare pricing, context window limits, and run live calculations below.

0 Tokens
Expected Output TokensEstimate generation cost

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic • 200,000 Context
Input (per 1M)
$3
Output (per 1M)
$15
Est. Total Cost$0.0000

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google • 2,000,000 Context
Input (per 1M)
$2
Output (per 1M)
$12
Est. Total Cost$0.0000

In-Depth Comparison: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

When choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.6 (by Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (by Google), developers must weigh API pricing and context window limits.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a context window of 200,000 tokens at an input cost of $3 per 1M tokens. On the other hand, Gemini 3.1 Pro provides a 2,000,000 token context window, priced at $2 per 1M input tokens. This helps developers find the best balance between performance and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 charges $3 per 1M input tokens, whereas Gemini 3.1 Pro charges $2. For output, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $15 vs $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro.
What is the context window difference between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers a context window of 200,000 tokens. In comparison, Gemini 3.1 Pro supports up to 2,000,000 tokens.
Who provides Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is provided by Anthropic, and Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google.