HomeModel ComparisonsClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Haiku 4.5vsGemini 3.1 Pro

Which model is more cost-effective? Compare pricing, context window limits, and run live calculations below.

0 Tokens
Expected Output TokensEstimate generation cost

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic • 200,000 Context
Input (per 1M)
$1
Output (per 1M)
$5
Est. Total Cost$0.0000

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google • 2,000,000 Context
Input (per 1M)
$2
Output (per 1M)
$12
Est. Total Cost$0.0000

In-Depth Comparison: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

When choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (by Google), developers must weigh API pricing and context window limits.

Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a context window of 200,000 tokens at an input cost of $1 per 1M tokens. On the other hand, Gemini 3.1 Pro provides a 2,000,000 token context window, priced at $2 per 1M input tokens. This helps developers find the best balance between performance and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $1 per 1M input tokens, whereas Gemini 3.1 Pro charges $2. For output, Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5 vs $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro.
What is the context window difference between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a context window of 200,000 tokens. In comparison, Gemini 3.1 Pro supports up to 2,000,000 tokens.
Who provides Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is provided by Anthropic, and Gemini 3.1 Pro is developed by Google.