HomeModel ComparisonsClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5vsGemini 3 Flash

Which model is more cost-effective? Compare pricing, context window limits, and run live calculations below.

0 Tokens
Expected Output TokensEstimate generation cost

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic • 200,000 Context
Input (per 1M)
$1
Output (per 1M)
$5
Est. Total Cost$0.0000

Gemini 3 Flash

Google • 1,000,000 Context
Input (per 1M)
$0.5
Output (per 1M)
$3
Est. Total Cost$0.0000

In-Depth Comparison: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash

When choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Gemini 3 Flash (by Google), developers must weigh API pricing and context window limits.

Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a context window of 200,000 tokens at an input cost of $1 per 1M tokens. On the other hand, Gemini 3 Flash provides a 1,000,000 token context window, priced at $0.5 per 1M input tokens. This helps developers find the best balance between performance and budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper: Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $1 per 1M input tokens, whereas Gemini 3 Flash charges $0.5. For output, Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5 vs $3 for Gemini 3 Flash.
What is the context window difference between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a context window of 200,000 tokens. In comparison, Gemini 3 Flash supports up to 1,000,000 tokens.
Who provides Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is provided by Anthropic, and Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google.